CPUs (wasRe: [Gllug] Install problems again)

Ian Norton bredroll at darkspace.org.uk
Sat Jan 11 13:19:39 UTC 2003


isnt the X range of intel chips just souped up ARM chips?

Chris Bell wrote:

>On Fri 10 Jan, Jason Clifford wrote:
>  
>
>
>  
>
>>Initially P4 CPUs offered less performance than P3 chips even though rated 
>>higher.
>>
>>That situation has been remedied for quite some time and P4 CPUs are no 
>>longer a performance problem.
>>
>>What is an issue is the power requirement and heat radiation however I 
>>cannot say to what extent as I've not yet implemented P4 servers - memory 
>>and disk subsystem performance are a lot more important for a server than 
>>CPU performance given how powerful even the lowest entry level CPU is 
>>these days.
>>    
>>
>
>   I have not seen much about the new Intel wide RISC chips, (X-range?).
>Perhaps the peripherals and add-ons would need to be redesigned, making them
>too expensive compared with a standard PC.
>
>  
>



-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list