Work For Spammers x4 (was: Re: [Gllug] Linux Job Vacancies x4)

[Formi]

 Hi,

 Knowing the general feeling of the menbers of the list about
 Consulting/Job agencies maybe the list policy ought to be changed.

 If the advertiser is not offering jobs in his/her own company only a link
 to the jobs description should be posted. And the subjetct should be
 something like [Jobs Link included].

 This would probably avoid the list being converted in the future on a
 target for many consulting firms if they ever read the list policy.

 In this particular case I doubt the poster ever considered looking at the
 gllug site for any posting policy.

  Formi
 FreeBSD 4.7 ThinkPad 570
 Linux Registered User #235743

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, John Hearns wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 11:02, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
> > On Tue 21 Jan, John Horton bloviated thus:
> > > May I firstly apologise in advance for the intrusion into your
> > > group.
> >
> > So what you're saying is that you know you shouldn't be spamming the
> > list.  But you did it anyway.  What ethics!  I know I'd be happy for
> > you to take a percentage of my wages.
>
> This has been discussed before on GLLUG.
> There is a clear policy on job adverts on the GLLUG website.
>
> I think the post from Penta Consulting was broadly OK and in
> line with the guidelines.
> The only thing which it breached I think is the subject line -
> but this was pretty clear anyway.
>
>
> --
> Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
> http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
>

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug