[Gllug] color in xterm emacs
Nix
nix at esperi.demon.co.uk
Sat Jul 5 15:48:39 UTC 2003
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003, Tethys stipulated:
>
> Nix writes:
>
>>vi is both more memory-hungry than xemacs, and larger. I dealt with
>>memory consumption in <87znu9bthj.fsf at amaterasu.srvr.nix>; as for
>>the size, well:
>>
>>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2073192 Dec 8 2002 /bin/vim
>>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1714384 May 31 23:06 /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.13
>
> Of course, vim != vi. Also, vim doesn't have to be fat:
Neither does Emacs; I'm comparing a fat Emacs to a fat vi.
--- of course, it's a bit mendacious since you can't actually edit text
with that Emacs without ~1.5Mb of dumped Lisp.
But anyway. ;}
--
`It is an unfortunate coincidence that the date locarchive.h was
written (in hex) matches Ritchie's birthday (in octal).'
-- Roland McGrath on the libc-alpha list
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list