[Gllug] Gnus and followups

[Rich Walker]

Ian Scott <mriscott at yahoo.co.uk> writes:

> > Just in case anyone else doesn't know this:
> >
> > <blush>
> > Using Reply-To in Gnus, and then trimming all the references away
> > *doesn't* create a new posting - Gnus is clever enough to remember
> > what's going on.
> > </blush>
> Hmm. does rmail/mail do the same?

RMAIL in my experience is "clever" - I read my mail using GNUS from
Maildir folders using IMAP on the
work box, then fetch it to the laptop and re-read it in RMAIL, which
does most of the filing and indexing. I still haven't got the BBDB-RMAIL
interface to do "annotate this person with this note when they are seen
in this context" but otherwise it's fine.

> Anyone know I replied to the digest to send this?

Seems fine.

> ... and I thought emacs did what I telled it.

No, it runs what you tell it through a lisp interpreter and then does
what the lisp interpreter tells it...

cheers, Rich

-- 
rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | rw at shadow.org.uk
front-of-tshirt space to let     251 Liverpool Road   |
                                 London  N1 1LX       | +UK 20 7700 2487

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug