[Gllug] "lowest common denominator"
Alistair Mann
alistair at lgeezer.net
Fri Jun 20 08:38:29 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thus spaketh Andrew Black (li) on Friday 20 June 2003 6:01 am:
> > However, they've changed the typesetting in recent versions, and
> > it's *apalling*. It looks like it's been dumbed down to appeal to
> > the lowest common denominator,
>
> As this thread is about pedantry, my hobby horse is the phrase
> "lowest common denominator". Not getting at Tet specifically but everyone
> that uses it.
>
> What is being implyed by this phrase is something no larger than all the
> (say) people involved.
> That is the highest common factor. The lowest common multiple/denominator
> is a number that is
> BIGGER than all the numbers you are considering.
The LCD is the lowest number common to two or more sets. 3, 5, 7 and 3, 6, 9
has an LCD of 3 -- the number that is SMALLER than all the numbers we are
considering.
The LCD in a population is a slightly different animal; it infers not the
dumbest individual in his person, but the lowest standard met by the largest
number of people. That sense seems clear from what Richard wrote.
I hate it when people say "Actually ..." or "The reality is ...". Everytime my
first g/f finished a sentence with "..., right?" I answered "Right!". It took
about three days for her to get Clue.
- --
Alistair
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+8sgIEz+/jt85AfsRArQTAKCSS94uOCBG2npSvXbtMgohvPAdzACbBM+A
a5M3utLr/QorgR7RcKxrLBQ=
=HG/y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list