[Gllug] Red Hat 9.0

Martin A. Brooks martin at clues.ltd.uk
Wed Mar 26 06:18:05 UTC 2003


At 19:39 25/03/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Now what I don't understand is what will be *so* new that they haven't
>gone for 8.1, 8.2, 8.3.

Redhat, much to their discredit, are playing the "big version number" game. 
After all, who on earth would want to use Debian 3 when Redhat 9 was available?

>  Also why not wait for the 2.6 kernel to be
>released to mark a major version release.

2.6.0 is, at least, months away from being released. It's also going to be 
at least a year before it's "stable" if 2.4 was anything to go by.

Regards


Martin A. Brooks, Clues Ltd
http://www.clues.ltd.uk/ 


-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list