[Gllug] More Viagra

[Adam Bower]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 03:34:15PM +0000, Nix wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Simon Stewart yowled:
> > Ohhh... now I know that it's awful form to reply to spam on list, but this seems pretty sophisticated to me. It looks like it's been
> > crafted to step around Spam Assassin, and I haven't seen any spam like it. Wonder how hard it'd be to stop (assuming that it didn't
> > come from an open relay)?
> 
> For me, it fired NO_REAL_NAME and SUBJ_VIAGRA, which wouldn't have been
> enough to class it as spam, except that it also hit DCC_CHECK,
> RAZOR2_CHECK, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100, and BAYES_60. 6.9 hits in total ->
> spam.

How do you find Razor? I am currently not using it because I don't trust 
other people to not wrongly classify things such as weekly whats on at the
cinema type mailings etc and I am too lazy to add it to my spam assassin
checks (and configure spam assassin to run directly on incoming mail rather
than through procmail). Does using razor increase false positives?

Adam
-- 
jabberid = quinophex at jabber.earth.li
AFFS || http://www.affs.org.uk/ || Not a filesystem

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug