[Gllug] Norman Lamb MP
Mike Brodbelt
mike at coruscant.demon.co.uk
Mon Oct 13 22:29:00 UTC 2003
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 12:47, Christopher Hunter wrote:
> On Saturday 11 Oct 2003 9:55 pm, Peter Rutherford wrote:
>
> > Yes, but that is a different type of radiation.
> > Kids are putting a device transmitting microwave
> > radiation in their trouser pockets as close as
> > they can get to their reproductive DNA short of
> > surgical implantation.
> >
> > Does the next generation belong to people who
> > think that mobiles suck?
>
> Oh dear. Another one fooled by the anti-technology lobby.
> Radio energy is radio energy regardless of frequency / wavelength. Perhaps a
> little basic EM theory would help? Look up "inverse-square law".....
Frequency matters a great deal, as the molecules in our body are much
better at absorbing some frequencies than others. Given fields of equal
intensity, microwaves would kill you a lot faster than low freqency
radio waves.
Mike.
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list