RBLs (was: Re: [Gllug] re: secondary MX preference levels)

[Paul Cupis]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 25 April 2004 07:30, "t.clarke" <tim at seacon.co.uk> wrote:
> I am not convinced that a secondary MX is worthwhile at all.
> We actually scrubbed-out the secondary MX provided by our upstream
> ISP for the very reason that it does no checking for 'dodgy'
> sender-IP's against any of the open-relay databases.
[snip]
> Incidentally open-relay checking, which we do, seems only to reject a
> few spams.  The majority of them get through; hence I now have the
> world largest pile of little blue pills :-)

I think it depends on which "open-relay"-type lists you use. I've had 
very favourable results using cbl.abuseat.org.

What RBLs do others use, and what do they recommend?

Paul Cupis
- -- 
paul at cupis.co.uk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCLxOAACgkQIzuKV+SHX/mCfACfVsI5ulyJitY98hVnChKWKwcX
yQQAnjHQ6mPPEK0bUwjvk3l08oBlajY+
=ZlsU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug