[Gllug] secure removal

[Ashley Evans]

t.clarke wrote:

>Ashley wrote:
>  
>
>>Why not add secure deleting to regular 'rm', have rm and rms* to do
>>pretend delete and real delete respectively.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>*not sure if rms or rs would be better.
>>    
>>
>
>
>You can, of course, call the compiled program anything you like, and
>if required, move 'rm' to something else !
>
>Tim
>
>
>  
>

Of course. I only mentioned it because it may be easy to miss the 's' 
and exec rm instead.

>********************************************************************************
>This E-Mail and any files transmitted  with it, are confidential
>and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
>whom they are addressed. If you have received this message
>in error please notify the sender and delete the message.
>
>  
>

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug