[Gllug] ``Confidential'' .sigs [Was: hosts.conf/nsswitch.conf debate]
Wiehe, Simon
simon.wiehe at csfb.com
Wed Dec 1 11:52:18 UTC 2004
> That's because your mail system is not much copy and doesn't support
> RFC2015. This is indeed annoying, but you can hardly blame Jan for that.
>
> doug.
And that is my point exactly. I am not blaming Jan for it as he has no control
over it. Consequently he should not blame us for the sigs that our
organisations append to our messages. :-)
I will leave this here because the last thing I want is a flame war. I will
put up with having to open 3 attachments to read the content ;-)
Simon
--
T: 020 76350943 / M: 07879 423002 / F: 020 79006980 / Skype: dougwinter
doug at isotoma.com / Isotoma, Open Source Software Consulting
Post: 2nd Floor, 145-157 St John Street, London, EC1V 4PY
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
==============================================================================
This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
==============================================================================
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list