[Gllug] Apple

[Paul Nasrat]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:55:40AM +0000, Tethys wrote:
> 
> Stephen Harker writes:
> 
> >> Both have (IMHO) better long term potential than OO.o.

> >Why? Just curious :)

> Because OO.o is a bloated pig. It's trying too hard to be MS Office,
> and has gone too far down that road to be salvagable IMHO. If nothing
> else, compare launch times. On my machine, with cold cache:
> 
> 	abiword:   sub 1 second
> 	gnumeric:  2 seconds
> 	oowriter:  13 seconds
> 	oocalc:    13 seconds

Out of curiosity have you tried OOo with prelink?

eg:

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-October/msg03248.html
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-November/msg00939.html

Paul
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug