[Gllug] Anyone using Linux 2.6.0 on production system?

Fri Jan 9 10:44:14 UTC 2004

On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 10:39, Tethys wrote:
> I'm not sure about your logic here.

Time.  2.4 has thousands upon thousands hours of testing.  Lots of clued
people pouring over the source has previously failed to spot this
problem. 

Given the significant amount of non-legacy code in 2.6 (in other words
"not stared at as much"), that's so much more code that could yet
contain nasty problems/exploits.

-- 
Martin A. Brooks, Clues Ltd
http://www.clues.ltd.uk/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20040109/cba19a27/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug