qmail dead ? was: [Gllug] ezmlm status?

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:35:59PM +0000, Tethys wrote:
> 
> Bruce Richardson writes:
> 
> >That said, I'll take Exim over Sendmail any time, as I've never
> >yet encountered a complex task that I couldn't solve cleanly with Exim.
> 
> Try routing mail based on sender, rather than recipient. This is where
> sendmail comes into its own, and I haven't found other MTAs than can
> match it.

Um, how hard have you looked?  The ease of sender-based routing (and
routing based on any other property of a message) was one of the reasons
I chose Exim.

> Yes, I know it's not a common thing to want to do

In fact, it's quite a common thing to need to do (for example, to avoid
eternal loops when running a mail filter on a different box), it's just
that a lot of people don't realise that it's possible at all.

-- 
Bruce

The ice-caps are melting, tra-la-la-la.  All the world is drowning,
tra-la-la-la-la.  -- Tiny Tim.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20040318/dc7cd057/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug