qmail dead ? was: [Gllug] ezmlm status?

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 04:18:11PM +0000, Jason wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> 
> > I don't think that does what Tet was referring to.  I'm quite sure it
> > doesn't.  Sender-based routing is where you decide how to route a
> > message (i.e. what the next delivery step is, local or remote) based on
> > the sender address or host.  All you can do with
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions is limit what Postfix will accept in the MAIL
> > command: you can't affect which transport will be used.
> 
> I know what sender based routing is and your wrong - you can do it using 
> smtpd_sender_restrictions but you have to use a FILTER: hack to accomplish 
> it. 
> 
> When postfix forwards a message for filtering all it does is route it to 
> the specified filter intact.

Ah, I see.  So the filter could then be an instance of postfix that only
used a particular transport or that used the sender-based routing hack.
That works.

-- 
Bruce

The ice-caps are melting, tra-la-la-la.  All the world is drowning,
tra-la-la-la-la.  -- Tiny Tim.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20040318/bf85d6c1/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug