[Gllug] re: backups

[will]

Alain Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:16:59AM +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> 
>>I'm sure I read something somewhere about writers laying down better
>>quality tracks if you run them more slowly. Possibly a concern if you
>>wish your discs to be readable by as wide a range of drives as possible.
> 
> Confirmation of this would be good. If you are writing a backup (to be
> potentially/hopefully readable in a few years time) then an extra hour
> in the writing is not really significant -- especially if it happens overnight.

I had also heard this, but have seen no actual proof, I would be very 
interested to hear if it is true.

Will.
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug