[Gllug] re: backups
will
will at hellacool.co.uk
Sun Sep 5 09:44:38 UTC 2004
Alain Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:16:59AM +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
>
>>I'm sure I read something somewhere about writers laying down better
>>quality tracks if you run them more slowly. Possibly a concern if you
>>wish your discs to be readable by as wide a range of drives as possible.
>
> Confirmation of this would be good. If you are writing a backup (to be
> potentially/hopefully readable in a few years time) then an extra hour
> in the writing is not really significant -- especially if it happens overnight.
I had also heard this, but have seen no actual proof, I would be very
interested to hear if it is true.
Will.
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list