[Gllug] SPAM - trying to block at SMTP level
Rich Walker
rw at shadow.org.uk
Wed Feb 16 15:15:52 UTC 2005
Rev Simon Rumble <simon at rumble.net> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
>> In your scenario, I would actually recommend greylisting. Greylisting
>> gives a temporary knockback to sender/recipient/ip-address tuples that
>> it hasn't seen before/recently. Kosher mail systems will retry,
>> spammers do not bother. The big win for you is that this happens at the
>> smtp conversation stage *before* the message itself is transmitted.
>
> Greylisting rocks! I find it knocks back 80-90% of spam before it even
> gets sent. Though I'd prefer you didn't implement it because once
> enough people do it, the spammers will adapt 8)
We tried it for about 3 days. I had so many complaints about real email
from real people not getting to us, that it got removed. Seems the
number of f'd up mail servers is much greater than we think.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | rw at shadow.org.uk
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list