[Gllug] spamassassin v bogofilter
Rich Walker
rw at shadow.org.uk
Thu Jun 2 14:11:24 UTC 2005
Michael Moritz <mimo at gn.apc.org> writes:
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 14:43, Rich Walker wrote:
>> Michael Moritz <mimo at gn.apc.org> writes:
>> > On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:17, Jason Clifford wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Michael Moritz wrote:
>> >> > This is a misunderstanding. The receiving SMTP server (the one that
>> >> > does the greylisting) reads the MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, and client
>> >> > address, then checks the greylisting database and issues a 450. This
>> >> > is before the DATA section of the SMTP session.
>> >>
>> >> You are trusting that all other MTAs and MUAs do the "right thing".
>> >> Experience shows that this sometimes is not the case.
>> >
>> > What do you mean? My SMTP server disconnects after the greylist check,
>> > the session is ended. No way the sender can continue sending the mail
>> > data as the tcp session is closed.
>>
>> The sender then drops the mail on the floor, or bounces it to the
>> originator with an unhelpful message.
>
> Thought this was about the reduction of mail server load, not weird MTA
> implementations...
Well, losing mail going to the server will reduce the load, but not in a
way you want.
And any strategy for running an MTA unfortunately has to take on board
that not everyone is running a Real MTA - some of them appear to have
hired a Big Consulting Firm to write a "Mail System" for them to make
sure it's as f'd up as possible...
>
>>
>> *This* is the problem with greylisting - critical upstream MTA's break
>> when presented with it.
>
> That is why you would whitelist them beforehand.
But you can't tell *until* you lose mail from them. And if it's, say, a
new customer, you might never know.
> BTW, there is still a problem with this. What does one of these "critical
> upstream MTAs" do when it is confronted with a genuine 4xx message? Does it
> just lose the message, seriously? I think that's even more worrying than
> greylisting...
Good question. I suspect some just tell the user "can't send your mail
hah haaa!" and others say "try again later". Anyone know?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | rw at shadow.org.uk
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list