[Gllug] vi vs emacs (repeat)

[will]

Benedikt Heinen wrote:
> Well, I would agree with that statement - nevertheless, I find it 
> ridiculous to see how these discussions end up in some instances, like 
> the quote above, which would tend to suggest that the author would 
> pretty much think that just through the macro language vi becomes the 
> superior editor (as the macro language would "settle the editor wars 
> debate" "once and for all")...

I didn't read it as 'vi is better', more that 'one was not better than 
the other, they are both powerful'.

Will.
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug