[Gllug] retro computing
Christian Smith
csmith at micromuse.com
Fri Oct 7 13:45:03 UTC 2005
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Andrew Farnsworth wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:23 , Nix <nix at esperi.org.uk> sent:
>
>>You're right; Oct 1985 for the 386, 1989 for the 486 (and I bought a 486
>>the following year).
>>
>>I misremembered.
>>
>>Fifteen years is extreme enough.
>
>Actually, the key factor here is when the cpu was put to rest. For the
>386 it was 1990 and the 486 was 1994. However, there have been several
>embeded systems that have been running a 486 equivalent (ex. pc104).
>This makes it very useful to support 486 in Linux. Recently this has
>changed and more and more of the embedded systems are changing to Via
>Eden chips that are much more modern.
It appears Intel still sell the 386:
http://www.intel.com/design/intarch/prodbref/27270903.htm
Not quite sure why anyone would design a new embedded product around a 386
core, but enough people must do.
>
>Andy Farnsworth
>
--
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
X - AGAINST MS ATTACHMENTS
/ \
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list