[Gllug] Creating SWF content on Linux
Daniel P. Berrange
dan at berrange.com
Wed Aug 23 23:25:47 UTC 2006
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Tethys wrote:
>
> Simon Perry writes:
>
> >Mind you if you are so anti using a Windows machine to create a
> >container/player then why are you considering a proprietary format for
> >distribution over the web ;-p Hell, wouldn't a Java player be a better
> >choice?
>
> Just curious... by what logic is Java any less proprietary than SWF?
There is a whole suite of open source java tools / runtime - not quite
100% coverage of Sun's official J2EE spec, but pretty damn close & good
enough for a large number of Java apps to be 100% free from their build
tool chain (ANT, ECJ), IDE (Eclipse), through to their runtime (GNU
ClassPath with a choice of at least 5 open source JVMs), and even a
mozilla plugin (gcjwebplugin). Both Fedora & Debian use a 100% open
source java stack.
Point me to the same end-to-end open source coverage for Flash.
Dan.
--
|=- GPG key: http://www.berrange.com/~dan/gpgkey.txt -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- berrange at redhat.com - Daniel Berrange - dan at berrange.com -=|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20060824/418dd08b/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list