[Gllug] Newly installed SpamAssassin less effective than an old installation (same version)

[Nix]

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Martin A. Brooks prattled cheerily:
> John Winters wrote:
>> I have not customised SA on either machine.
> 
> Did you have Bayesian learning switched on?

Do you have trusted_networks set?

(If not, please set it properly ;) )

> If so the new machine probably hasn't yet seen enough messages to
> start adding bayes weighting to message scores.

I'd not expect that to push hit rates down to only 10%; that's far lower
even than the -set0 (no Bayes, no net tests) should score.

What sort of rules get hit? Could you post an example of something that
SA misses which you'd guess it shouldn't?

-- 
`I must caution that dipping fingers into molten lead
 presents several serious dangers.' --- Jearl Walker
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug