[Gllug] What is the Gnome & KDE difference??
Emon
contact_emon at gawab.com
Wed Mar 29 06:38:07 UTC 2006
> Personally, I detested KDE because it
> was fat, bloated and slow. Plus, gtk+ was a dream to code in compared to
> Qt. But hey, after some years of playing catch up, GNOME is just as fat,
> bloated and slow, too. Possibly even edging ahead these days.
>
It seems to me that the air is ripe those exact accusations nowadays!!
When people say "slow" what are they actually comparing them(KDE/GNOME)
against?? certainly not against CLI... that would be quite unfair!!...
right?
And when people say "fat" are they referring to the bundled applications
that these Desktop provide or something else?? and is it such a bad
thing providing extra applications??
Also by "bloated" are people referring to the frequent bugs that are
uncovered?? if so.. I thought bugs were a reality of life in software
development!!
Please feel free to correct me if you think my understanding is not
accurate :)
Thanks
Emon
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list