[Gllug] [bit OT] what block size is best for a tape drive?
Adrian McMenamin
adrian at mcmen.demon.co.uk
Mon May 8 08:17:33 UTC 2006
On Mon, May 8, 2006 8:35 am, Mike Brodbelt said:
> t.clarke wrote:
>
>> I have never used the hardware compression on the drives, as I believe
>> the feature requires suitable software (not available on my machine) to
>> write the necessary command(s) to the drive. As far as I am aware the
>> drive
>> runs at the same physical speed whether compression is on or off;
>> compression
>> is simply done on the fly and results in more data being written to a
>> given
>> block of tape.
>
> Hardware compression requires no host-side software. Most drives provide
> a means to control it through software - the mt command can toggle
> compression on or off for DAT drives or other compatible hardware.
>
Indeed, and I have turned it on. But is there any point is using it
(hardware compression) alongside software (bz2 or gzip)?
The backup script currently does this
tar cvjf /dev/st0 /
and I am wondering if that is the best way to do it?
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list