[Gllug] C/C++ mentor
TreeBoy
gllug at petethetree.co.uk
Wed Nov 22 00:17:56 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 23:39, Pete Ryland wrote:
> On 21/11/06, TreeBoy <gllug at petethetree.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Just like a lot of things Linux and indeed FOSS, choice is IMO a great
> thing. Just like we have the choice of GTK+ or Qt (or TK, or ncurses,
> or plain-old X, or ...), we also have choice of development
> environment to be used to create apps with these toolkits. I can see
>
Firstly thanks for a very calm response despite my rather inflammatory start.
You are entirely right in all of what you say here, but my problem has always
been related to:
> I don't think it's that much trouble to add a
> few extra things to your google searches to find information relevant
> to your chosen way of doing things.
I do not know which extra terms to add because I did not know that there were
other terms that are relevant.
> > With KDE and QT there is only really one toolset and everyone deals with
> > that same one.
>
> This is not really true. There are plenty of Qt and KDE developers
> that don't use Kdevelop. However, you'll still hear them recommend it
> to those new to the toolkit.
Again, you are entirely right except that "everyone points you at KDevelop if
you want to learn". I believe that GNOME is missing out on huge numbers of
developers because there is no GNOME equivalent.
>
> > GNOME may well be technically superior
>
> I was going to say that that was debatable, but really it's not even
> possible to debate. They are technically *different*! :-)
Again, you are entirely right, but I wanted to placate some of the flamers
that do exist on this list. (Did I just sound like one ?)
>
> > Here I am hanging myself out to dry and I hope that some developers for
> > GNOME will get involved in a conversation that may be of interest to the
> > First Poster and re-educate my opinion.
>
> As it turns out, I currently share some of your pain. Having not done
> anything with GTK+ for a few years, I wanted to write some simple
> frontends with PyGTK, and found little improvement in the learning
> curve since GTK1.0.
I'm now learning wxPython (which is GTK-based embarrassingly) because it works
on Windows and Linux. Learning Python and wx at the same time is surprisingly
less difficult than I imagined.
>
> Sorry for the divergence of the topic, and for the pimping, but I
> thought it might be interesting to some.
Really appreciate what you have to say.
Cheers,
>
> Pete
(My name's Pete too!)
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list