[Gllug] LinuxDoc / DocBook Documentation Writting

Ryland, Peter peter.ryland at squaregain.co.uk
Thu Sep 14 13:36:53 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 01:45 +0100, Nix wrote:
> And if you have a really document to work on, let someone else proofread

s/really /really big /

Funnily enough, a grammar checker may have actually picked that up. :-)

> it. Let *them* be your grammar checker. (That last sentence would be
> flagged as grammatically incorrect by some idiot prescriptivists and
> even more idiot grammar checkers: singular `they', you see.)

I guess I'm an idiot prescriptivist then.  I despise that usage.  Just
pluralise the whole thing instead if you want to avoid the "he/she"
thing.

Anyway, the biggest beef I have with grammar checkers is that they don't
take into account the context nor the intentions of the author (like
suggesting the avoidance of passive voice on a scientific experiment
report).  Also, users need to actually grok grammar anyway in order to
fix their sentences appropriately.

Pete


*****************************************************************************
This communication is confidential and is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of 
the information and you are requested to notify 
postmaster at squaregain.co.uk immediately that you have 
received it and then destroy the copy in your possession. 
Squaregain Ltd is authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and is a member of the LSE.
******************************************************************************

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list