[Gllug] SpamAssassin falling behind
Stephen Harker
steve at pauken.co.uk
Fri Sep 1 12:54:10 UTC 2006
John Winters wrote:
> When I first installed SpamAssassin it seemed to be pretty good at picking
> up all my spam without any false positives. As time has gone on though it
> seems to have fallen behind. I now get a significant percentage of spam
> slipping under SA's guard (especially stock tips).
>
> Thunderbird is shit-hot and picks up everything, AFAICS pretty much
> infallibly, but SA seems to have developed mould or something.
>
> Is there anything I need to do to SA on a regular basis to keep it up to
> speed?
>
> The platform is Debian Sarge, fully patched up to date.
A fully patched and up to date sarge install of spamassassin is over a
year old. Take a look at upgrading spamassassin from Debian volatile or
backports and see if that helps.
http://volatile.debian.net/
http://www.backports.org/
Stephen
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list