[Gllug] [OT] Times Article on ABD was Fighting a virus

John G Walker johngwalker at tiscali.co.uk
Tue Feb 20 16:22:54 UTC 2007



On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:07:28 +0000 "- Tethys" <tethys at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/20/07, John G Walker <johngwalker at tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > If you have a graph like this:
> >
> > -------------
> >               ---------------------
> >
> > you're not drawing a conclusion from two data points if you point
> > out where the line breaks. You're identifying the ends of two trend
> > lines,
> 
> So "this was due to the congestion charge" isn't a conslusion?

I don't understand this question.

> 
> Aside from which, you don't have two trend lines, you have a line and
> a point.
> 
> Tet

I have two sets of daily observations. 

I'm not sure where you're going with this. It doesn't seem to have
anything to do with the question of bus lanes. Or are you advancing yet
another explanation for the fall in traffic in central London (or,
if you prefer, parts of it)?

-- 
 All the best,
 John
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug


More information about the GLLUG mailing list