[Gllug] [VACANCY] SQL Developer

[Mike Brodbelt]

Nix wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2007, Dean Wilson said:
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:34:36AM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
>>> I'm not sure I'd ever choose it over PostgreSQL,
>> You should seriously reconsider using PostgreSQL anywhere that requires
>> replication.
>>
>> Slony is... not very good is a polite term, and mammoth isn't widely
>> shouted about so I'd be worried about the lack of users and community.
> 
> But last I heard MySQL's replicated tables were constrained to be
> entirely in memory! How useful is *that*?

You're thinking of the ndbcluster storage engine. For straight 
replication, there's no such restriction - it works pretty well.

Mike

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug