[Gllug] Linux invalidates your HP warranty
Bernard Peek
bap at shrdlu.com
Sat Mar 31 12:47:35 UTC 2007
In message <87odm9zk9t.fsf at hades.wkstn.nix>, Nix <nix at esperi.org.uk>
writes
>On 30 Mar 2007, Bernard Peek stated:
>> The point of re-imaging the drive as the first step in diagnosis is to
>> restore the software to a known good state. If the machine runs
>> normally at that point it can be returned as fixed.
>
>And if it doesn't, oops, they just blew your data away for no good
>reason.
>
>Isn't this a very good way to piss off lots of customers?
As far as I know it's how all the major PC suppliers run triage. If you
send a PC back for repair there's a very good chance that it will come
back reset to ex-factory state. Apart from speeding up diagnosis it also
prevents embarrassing incidents where the engineer discovers unsavoury
pictures on a machine sent for repair.
Certainly when I was running an internal repair centre we re-imaged any
machine that we though might have a software problem, but that was in a
place where there wasn't supposed to be any data on the internal drives,
it should all have been on the servers.
If your data is particularly precious then you can probably arrange to
send the machine in without its disk, and that's the safest option if
you don't have a recent backup.
I think in this particular case it's worth restating that the original
article doesn't say that HP weren't going to support the warranty. It
says that they weren't going to accept it back with Linux still
installed. If they had said that Linux invalidated the warranty you can
be sure that the article would have said so, it would make it a much
stronger story and the journalist wouldn't have missed the opportunity
to include it. So to me it looks as if the article was a space-filler on
a slow news day.
--
Bernard Peek
bap at shrdlu.com
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list