[Gllug] Gllug Digest, Vol 47, Issue 6

Fri May 18 10:20:53 UTC 2007

On Tuesday 15 May 2007 12:00, gllug-request at gllug.org.uk wrote:
> Send Gllug mailing list submissions to
> 	gllug at gllug.org.uk
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	gllug-request at gllug.org.uk
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	gllug-owner at gllug.org.uk
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gllug digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: List back (Caroline Ford)
>    2. Re: List back (Mike Brodbelt)
>    3. Re: List back (Mike Brodbelt)
>    4. Re: [tempgllug] More routing (Juergen Schinker)
>    5. Re: debian Sarge Apache2 php not working (Rhys Powell)
>    6. font annoyance of the day (Nix)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:04:52 +0100
> From: Caroline Ford <caroline.ford.work at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gllug] List back
> To: Greater London Linux User Group <gllug at gllug.org.uk>
> Message-ID: <1179187492.5597.15.camel at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 23:13 +0100, John G Walker wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:35:43 +0100 Caroline Ford
> >
> > <caroline.ford.work at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > I've just found the invite to the temp list. Googlemail had decided it
> > > was spam and not sent it to me. Prior to this point I'd no idea it
> > > didn't deliver by POP3 anything it flagged up as spam.
> >
> > Interesting. How does Googlemail decide what is spam and what not?
> >
> > Bogofilter gave that particular message on my PC a spamicity of
> > 5.62658e-08 (ie barely any chance that the message was spam).
> >
> > I <3 Bayesian spam filters! :)
> >
> > --
> >  All the best,
> >  John
>
> "innovative spam-filtering mechanisms"
>
> "Superior spam protection using innovative Google technology"
>
> Not a clue..
>
> Caroline
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:32:53 +0100
> From: Mike Brodbelt <mike at coruscant.demon.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Gllug] List back
> To: Greater London Linux User Group <gllug at gllug.org.uk>
> Message-ID: <46495415.1010508 at coruscant.demon.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Andy Smith wrote:
> > I suppose the choice is between the Opteron and the dual / quad
> > core Xeons.
>
> IMHO the Intel stuff is the best right now - the Core 2 Duo stuff is
> very nice. AMD may well one up Intel with their next chip rev, but for
> now, Intel is king of the hill...
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:34:46 +0100
> From: Mike Brodbelt <mike at coruscant.demon.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Gllug] List back
> To: Greater London Linux User Group <gllug at gllug.org.uk>
> Message-ID: <46495486.6010604 at coruscant.demon.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> - Tethys wrote:
> > On 5/14/07, Mike Brodbelt <mike at coruscant.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >> They also have HPs iLo, which is kinda crap*, but it's something I
> >> suppose.
> >
> > Coming from a Sun background, I was horrified at the junk that's being
> > passed off as a "lights out manager" in the PC world, and in
> > particular, in Compaq/HP machines.
>
> Absolutely - give me a Sun LOM any day. I've been pretty unimpressed
> with what's on offer, but the assumption that you're going to be running
> a silly GUI on your headless server is to blame for a lot of the idiocy.
>
> Mike
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:38:39 +0100
> From: Juergen Schinker <ba1020 at homie.homelinux.net>
> Subject: Re: [Gllug] [tempgllug] More routing
> To: gllug at gllug.org.uk
> Message-ID: <1179214719.7291.4.camel at sumsi.homelinux.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 18:24 +0100, Tethys wrote:
> > Anthony Newman writes:
> > >Why do you want to do this, out of curiosity?
> >
> > I have a box at work, with 3 interfaces:
> >
> > eth0: fast net connection, supplied by the managed offices we're in
> > eth1: backup adsl connection, owned by us, with a static IP
> > eth2: other office machines hang off here
> >
> > The requirement is to be able to ssh into that machine from the
> > outside world (and potentially more, but ssh is a good starting
> > point). We can't come in from the fast connection, as they NAT
> > our traffic (along with all the other tenants in the building),
> > so the machine is not directly IP addressable from the outside
> > world. Getting them to allow incoming traffic is not as option.
> >
> > So we need to come in over the ADSL line. But that's no use if
> > a SYN packet comes in and the SYN/ACK goes back out of the other
> > interface, and hence is NATed to a different source IP. Hence the
> > need to send the reply back out over the same interface.
>
>         $IPTABLES -t mangle -A OUTPUT -s ! 10.10.0.0/16 -p tcp -m
> multiport --sport 22 -j MARK --set-mark 9
>         $IPTABLES -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o eth0 -j SNAT --to <IP of
> interface>
>         ip route flush table 10
>         ip route add default via 172.14.1.100 dev <interface> table 10
>         ip rule add fwmark 9 table 10
>         ip route flush cache
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:22:55 +0100
> From: Rhys Powell <stanley12 at blueyonder.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Gllug] debian Sarge Apache2 php not working
> To: Greater London Linux User Group <gllug at gllug.org.uk>
> Message-ID: <464989FF.4040201 at blueyonder.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Chris Bell wrote:
> > On Mon 14 May, Rhys Powell wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >    I hope you read and followed the release notes, it recommends using
> > the latest version of aptitude, and lists a series of discrete steps to
> > follow.
>
> Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
>
> But anyway thanks for all the help, the guidance to get me thinking
> right and reminding me to read the documentation all is well with the
> web server.
>
> Thanks again
>
> Rhys
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug