[Gllug] OT: algorithm needed
abuse at cabal.org.uk
Sun Aug 10 20:48:18 UTC 2008
On 10 Aug 2008, at 21:33, salsaman at xs4all.nl wrote:
> However, I want the last read to be as close to max_block_size as
> E.g. if total==100, max==45, I could read:
> 45, 45, 10.
> However it would be preferable to read:
> 40, 40, 20, or better yet:
> 35, 35, 30
With the requirements as you described, 10, 45, 45 would be even more
optimal. Are you sure that's really what you want? If so, you can just
do a quick modulo calculation, make the first transfer be the "short"
one and the rest be of maximum size.
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
More information about the GLLUG