[Gllug] Can I link GNU AGPL code with GPL 2 code?

[Progga]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:28:21AM +0100, salsaman at xs4all.nl wrote:
> >
> > If it is not incorporating the packages but just linking to them
> > externally it is likely not an issue, but you would need to include both
> > licenses when distributing if you ship the packages with. Then each
> > license would be used applied to each part individually instead of on
> > both together. iirc

I am both distributing and linking.  Although I have mentioned in the README
that different parts have different licenses.

> No, linking counts as a combined work. That is why binary Nvidia drivers
> cannot be distributed with the Linux kernel, for example.

This is getting scary.  The whole thing relies on PEAR for ORM stuff and others.
Now I am wondering what's the nearest to GNU AGPL, if I can't use that.

And now it's also getting clear to me why Drupal has always stayed away from
PEAR.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20080215/7a7d87f2/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug