[Gllug] Spamassassin (again)
Nix
nix at esperi.org.uk
Wed Nov 26 00:02:08 UTC 2008
On 24 Nov 2008, Adrian McMenamin verbalised:
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:37 +0000, Nix wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2008, Adrian McMenamin verbalised:
>>
>> > Does strike me though, that this is still a bug of some sort as the
>> > previous version didn't seem to mind.
>>
>> Huge blacklists would always have a nasty memory hit. This has actually
>> improved fractionally recently: the memory consumption hasn't changed
>> but locality of reference should be better.
>
> Yes, but it is the same huge list that I was using before - without
> breaking the system.
Perl version change, perhaps?
It's worth raising an SA bug about this anyway.
--
`Not even vi uses vi key bindings for its command line.' --- PdS
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list