[Gllug] Spamassassin (again)

Nix nix at esperi.org.uk
Wed Nov 26 00:02:08 UTC 2008


On 24 Nov 2008, Adrian McMenamin verbalised:

> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:37 +0000, Nix wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2008, Adrian McMenamin verbalised:
>> 
>> > Does strike me though, that this is still a bug of some sort as the
>> > previous version didn't seem to mind.
>> 
>> Huge blacklists would always have a nasty memory hit. This has actually
>> improved fractionally recently: the memory consumption hasn't changed
>> but locality of reference should be better.
>
> Yes, but it is the same huge list that I was using before - without
> breaking the system.

Perl version change, perhaps?

It's worth raising an SA bug about this anyway.

-- 
`Not even vi uses vi key bindings for its command line.' --- PdS
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list