[Gllug] ed vs emacs/vi, was: ed vs emacs, was: OpenMoko Neo Freerunner
James Laver
james.laver at gmail.com
Sun May 10 10:01:10 UTC 2009
On 10 May 2009, at 09:11, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> And sometimes there's a reason why none of them are available, like
> the
> one Alain mentioned or something simpler and harser, like them all
> being
> somewhere in /usr and that partition having been unmounted.
That's why the FHS says your mount command should be in /bin.
> Most Linuxes do not install anything that provides /bin/vi by
> default, so at
> this point ed and sed are what you are stuck with.
Personal experience of Linuxes says they always come with either vi or
nano. Even debian.
I may choose to install emacs instead, but the point is you always
have *something*.
Which Linuxes are you thinking of?
--James
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list