[Gllug] To partition or not to partition
Nix
nix at esperi.org.uk
Thu Oct 14 13:27:02 UTC 2010
On 14 Oct 2010, John Hearns verbalised:
> On 13 October 2010 16:18, Tethys <sta296 at astradyne.co.uk> wrote:
>> John Edwards writes:
>>
>>>Are there any performance hits for swap on LVM on RAID?
>>
>> Swapping is itself so glacially slow that any extra overhead
>> added by LVM or RAID will be utterly irrelevant. If you're
>> worried about performance, then build your machine so that
>> it doesn't swap in the first place.
>
> LVM or RAID? Hah. Real Men (TM) use swap over iSCSI.
I have used swap over degraded RAID where part of the RAID was situated
atop an NBD (in extremis, while waiting for a replacement disk, after a
double drive failure on a RAID-5 array: the latter failure was slow
enough that I could rescue the data into an NBDed disk image). Does that
count?
(I started making proper backups after that.)
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list