[Gllug] QT GUI Project

Nuno Pedrosa nunomdp at gmail.com
Wed May 11 09:59:27 UTC 2011


This, as usual is turning out to be a quite interesting discussion.
Specially the post from John Hearns where he mentions that a big oil player
is actually using Linux.

However we are a bit missing the point of my post. I am actually looking for
some help in revamping out GUI in QT.

Do you guys think it is the platform to go in terms of having a true
multiplatform highly specialized engineering software.
Mind that the number crunching work is done in Fortran and indeed we already
supply Linux versions of the library (AKA DLL in other platforms).

Nuno

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:35, James Roberts <j.roberts at stabilys.com> wrote:

>
> On 10/05/11 18:22, John Hearns wrote:
>
>> ps. another bit of advice - and I know this will provoke howls here,
>> certify your software for:
>> RHEL or SLES
>> and tell your customers it will run on CentOS and OpenSUSE
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> I started out with SLS and then Red Hat.
>
> We have about 40% of our clients using Linux as the principal
> fileserver/mail system and indeed virtual host, with 60% having Linux-hosted
> backup systems.
>
> The rest have fundamental requirements for vertical software that only runs
> on the Windows stack (because the authors hook into the stack, usually at
> the Outlook and Word automation level), and it is not going to change in the
> near future if ever...
>
> All of the Linux fileservers are CentOS-based, so if anything goes
> sufficiently pear-shaped and we can't actually fix it (so far so good!) as a
> last resort we can move them to Red Hat. Same if CentOS disappears...
>
> We only have one customer running Red Hat and they have two datacenters and
> are running a *lot* of Red Hat, and are happy to pay the support contract
> costs. I'm happy too 'cos it feeds something back to Red Hat (who have
> earned it).
>
>
>  they are the common distros in use for engineering software. Sorry. I
>> know. I should use Debian or Bill Gates will own my soul.
>>
>
> RH is good and solid as a rock but I find Debian more elegant (just
> personal taste?). We do use Debian for most of our own infrastructure (plus
> some CentOS and *BSD) and I am very happy with it.
>
> I can't get on with SuSE, for some reason (prior dreadful experience it
> would be), and Fedora makes me slightly sea-sick...
>
> On the desktop however, I am the only person in the organisation to run
> Linux, and currently it's Ubuntu (with various Windows VMs - XP, 7/32 - to
> enable me to follow a customer through their error path).
>
> --
> Stabilys Ltd            www.stabilys.com
> 244 Kilburn Lane
> LONDON
> W10 4BA
>
> 0845 838 5370
>
> --
> Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
> http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20110511/78c300c9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug


More information about the GLLUG mailing list