[Gloucs] Microsoft.

[GEOFF BAGLEY]

Thanks guys.  Geoff

--- On Mon, 12/7/10, Sean Keeney <seany at seanyseansean.com> wrote:

From: Sean Keeney <seany at seanyseansean.com>
Subject: Re: [Gloucs] Microsoft.
To: "Gloucestershire LUG" <gloucs at mailman.lug.org.uk>
Date: Monday, 12 July, 2010, 13:06

I think I may have seen that article, and it referenced comments on the Mini
Microsoft blog if that helps?

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Gerd <busker at busker.org> wrote:

> On 12/07/2010 13:08, Geoff Bagley wrote:
> > In my idle moments I often search round all Linux-related news feeds.
> >
> > Last week, in addition to reading about Microsoft products and their
> > failures and woes,  I cam across a site (or was it a blog?)
> > where claims were made that the upper echelons of their management
> > had become increasingly dis-functional,  with in-fighting,  and lacking
> > communication with the more-technical middle management.
> >
> > I  decided that I would like to follow that up when I had more time,
> > but  sadly I can no longer find the original piece in order to re-read it
> > and follow it up.
> >
> > Did anyone else see such an item ?
> >
> > Geoff
>
> Hmm, no, but I do speak to Microsoft quite a lot in relation to their
> HPC products.  I'll ask next time I speak to them :)
>
> Gerd.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gloucs mailing list
> gloucs at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gloucs
>
_______________________________________________
gloucs mailing list
gloucs at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gloucs