[Klug-general] Expressing opinions

[Karl Lattimer]

Wow, every member really IS that anally retentive. 

I formed valid arguments, which were then commented against in a
retarded manor. I think before you start kicking off about my expressive
use of language you should realise something.

If people are going to make themselves a target, then I'm going to have
a go at them, simply because, I get a kick out of it. All it takes is to
ditch the ridiculous comments about how things were in the good ol'
days, and bitterly criticising companies who are good for no reason
other than a personal dislike. I think my points were easily well made,
and illustrated quite eloquently, but seriously the woman only replied
in order to wind me up, so fuck it, I'll bite, I'll lower the bar as far
as it has to go. Its more fun that way.

If you have such a problem, moderate me.

If you want to shut your ears off to profanity which is well structured
in a humorous context then you're about as well balanced as the
christian festival of light and their reaction to life of brian. I
suggest to try and alleviate this problem you look around the fucking
world we live in and shutting the fuck up. 

If thats enough to horrify you then remember, there is murder, maiming
and subjugation of people all around the world, that pisses me off, you
do me the favor of solving all that and I won't insult people in the
best way I know how. This is the internet, the laws thankfully don't yet
shut off freedom of speech, although I can see that coming sooner or
later, primarily because of people like you who don't like to hear bad
things, or see bad things. 

Ye gods, sort yourself out, if you don't want to hear it, go into
another public forum. If you're horrified, then great I have achieved my
aim.

K,

On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 01:22 +0000, Mike wrote:

> Well, I have just spent a hour of my time reading the iPhone thread.  It would 
> be very nice if, when posting options, people could think carefully about 
> what they are saying.  Please try to be open minded and objective in what you 
> are saying.  Try to be realistic and balanced in what you say and backup your 
> comments with facts.  If you disagree with something, respond in the same 
> way; state *why* you disagree and back this up with facts.
> 
> I am, quite frankly, horrified by some of the comments that have been posted 
> this evening.  Is it really necessary, in a conversation about the Apple 
> iPhone, to deviate onto such subjects as religion and oral sex?  If you have 
> an opposing opinion surely it would be better to express that in a 
> constructive and factual way?  If you have to resort to being patronising and 
> name calling, really your argument is already lost.
> 
> Mike.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kent mailing list
> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/kent/attachments/20070111/9182e340/attachment.html