[Klug-general] Synopsis of the Saturday meeting

[George Prowse]

Mike Rentell wrote:
> 
> George Prowse wrote:
>> Mike Rentell wrote:
>>> George Prowse wrote:
>>>> On 3 Dec 2008, at 17:58, Goldfish wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3 Dec 2008, at 14:09, J D Freeman wrote:
>>>>>> Why do we need the extra bits in there that aren't relevant?
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think ...
>>>> ¡¡¡ɹǝllɐɯs uǝʌǝ slıɐɯǝ ǝɥʇ ǝpɐɯ sıɥʇ ɟı sı  ʎuunɟ ʎllɐǝɹ ǝq plnoʍ ʇɐɥʍ
>>> That's clever. I didn't know you could do that with simple text. My 
>>> Firefox tells me it is in Unicode (UTF-8).
>>>
>>> MikeR
>>> in Folkestone
>>>
>> Yup, as long as you use UTF-8 and LC=ALL then you should be able to read 
>> it perfectly, albeit upside down :)
>>
> On closer inspection - all is upside down except the letter Ls - which 
> ain't. How odd.
> 
> MikeR
> 
oh well, can't win them all!

It isn't an upside down font, it just uses mathematical and other 
symbols to create a full alphabet