[Klug-general] OOo ver 3 incompatibility
michael.rentell at ntlworld.com
Tue Dec 16 14:59:08 UTC 2008
Mike Evans wrote:
> Mike Rentell wrote:
> > That sounds like a kind invitation from MikeE, but I don't undestand
> > most of it.
> yum, or YUM is Yellowdog Update Manager I seem to remember. For this to
> make any sense you have to know that Yellow Dog was a distribution of
> Linux which did some innovative things and then floundered only to be
> resuscitated as a distro for the X-box or some other game console thingy
> I wouldn't be interested in.
> Anyway, one of the good things that came out of it was a package manager
> called yum. Putting Gentoo to one side (which most people do eventually
> :) - It has its own software installation manager designed to work with
> source code) that pretty much splits the world into two: the yummers
> and the apt-getters.
> Debian packages come in .deb files, are managed by the apt-* suite of
> programs at the higher level and dpkg program at the low level. Redhat
> Package Manager packages come in .rpm files, are managed by yum at the
> higher level and the rpm program at the low level.
> Traditionally Debian (and by extension Ubuntu) people think that there
> is nothing better than apt-get. This was true when rpm based distros
> only had the rpm program, but with yum they have something equally handy
> and somewhat more intelligible in terms of command structure IMHO. This
> is all fairly irrelevant if you don't like command line utilities
> because there are now various GUI tools (synaptics/pirut) which sit over
> either system and make the whole thing a point and click doddle provided
> you don't want to do anything remotely interesting.
> Dan Attwood wrote:
>> I think the page you need to read in Linux Format is the one that
>> mentions dodgy nvidia drivers in Mandriva! Not got the mag in fornt of
>> me but i can give you the number tonight.
> All this to one side - I've just seen Dan's later post on dodgy nvidia
> drivers with Mandriva and suspect that he may be onto something there.
> I've not bought Linux Format in a few months.
> Mauriat Miranda has a helpful page on getting and installing nvidia
> drivers using yum and or using the nvidia installer. It is written for
> Fedora people so it uses the RPMFusion repository which would not be
> suitable for you. However but the part on using the nvidia installer
> should be applicable to Manriva. Alternatively there may a suitable yum
> repository for Mandriva. see
> I am successfully using the nvidia driver, installed from the
> RPMFususion repository using YUM on both Fedora 8 and Fedora 10. I
> chose this as I wanted more than the 2D support from the 'nv' driver and
> was uncomfortable using the 'nouveau' driver in its present experimental
> state for my main machine. On F8 I run OOo2 on 10 I have OOo3.
That's all very informative, my apologies for the delay. Many thanks.
I've gone back to OOo 2.2.1 under Mandriva 2008.1 after a brief cycle
through some other distros to see how I get on. Does Mandriva use YUM?
It just seems to have its own getter and installer - perhaps it is YUM
with it's badge torn off.
I'm not sure why the latest version of OOo should cause a failure which
throws up the KDE error screen and forever afterwards the top and bottom
bars of every window are missing - everything else seems to work though.
Odd that. It all resets after a logout/login but it don't help.
I assume it is a graphics error - could be wrong. My graphics card has
the nvidia chipset and clocks in as 'G72 [GeForce 7300SE]'. Mandriva's
installation routine does not recognise that but says that it has a
special driver available and offers that for installation. That turns
out to be the driver for GeForce 8800. Do you think that could be the
I do, of course, have the installation disk for the graphics card and
that has a linux sub-directory on it with 32bit and 64bit drivers. I've
tried to run those but it throws up a konsole screen about motherboard
and network cards. Nothing about graphics as far as I can see and anyway
it won't install.
Baffled! So I suppose I'll stay with Mandriva 2008.1 until Mandriva
2009.1 comes out (currently available version is 2009.0) and OOo 2.2.1.
Pity though, the windoze version loads a lot more quickly and is
flashier than the earlier version.
I suppose this is progress.
Actually I might not install Mandriva 2009 because I really am not
impressed with KDE4. I lose a lot of useful functionality.
More information about the Kent