goldfish654 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 14:48:42 UTC 2009
2009/12/10 Colin McCarthy <binarysignal at gmail.com>:
> I was always lead to believe that IPv6 would only ever be adopted by
> telecoms providers and internet backbone people. Us regular home and
> business users would not need it. Managing IPv6 is harder than IPv4 as
> its not easily configurable by end users.
Well, that's the thing. If the point of IPv6 was to get more
addresses, what would be the point of that if only telecom providers
used them? Unless the ISPs/telecom companies have more IP addresses
than customers, then this doesn't make sense.
> Just my expired CCNA opinion :-)
More information about the Kent