[Klug-general] Live and Dev enviroments

[Luc Tidy]

Oh aye, both are effective and have their own pros and cons, just 
mentioning git as it's the one that I know at least a little something 
about as opposed to what may as well be nothing.

~Luc

On 26/11/10 14:04, Karl Buckland wrote:
> I agree. I think you probably only hear more about git because it's
> used by lots of large open source projects. I expect more companies
> use SVN. I use it personally and at work and it's very easy to set up.
> I'm sure it's also completely adequate for your needs.
>
> Karl
>
>
> On 26 November 2010 13:40, David Halliday<david.halliday at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I can do some kind of talk on build/release management with SVN at some
>> point for the LUG, not tomorrow as I am going to be out of Kent.
>> I think SVN is still very valid and will continue to be valid for some time.
>> It is very powerful and unless you are managing something
>> very decentralised then GIT is more configuration work than you need.
>>
>> On 26 November 2010 13:31, Dan Attwood<danattwood at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> My big problem is that I've yet to get my head around subversion of any
>>> other system like it. The whole world seems to be moving towards git so this
>>> is probably where I'll go to. Unfortunately my editor (netbeans) doesn't
>>> support git yet
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kent mailing list
>>> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kent mailing list
>> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kent mailing list
> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
>