[Klug-general] To Dan regarding apology and response to Bash/Curl advice

George Prowse george.prowse at gmail.com
Fri Apr 15 18:58:50 UTC 2011


On 15/04/2011 19:41, Mike Evans wrote:
>
>
> On 15/04/11 18:23, George Prowse wrote:
>
>> Also, to anyone whose mail client creates a different thread if the
>> subject is changed: get a better client. It shouldn't matter when the
>> subject says.
>>
>> Damn, I was so tempted to change the Subject in this :)
>
> My reader, I believe, uses the in-reply-to and references fields from
> the header like most recent ones. However I respect those who user an
> older reader.
>
> In fact I think it makes some sense for the sender's application to
> disregard those fields if the user changes the subject, effectively
> starting a new thread.
>
Then it defeats the object of replying to a thread.



More information about the Kent mailing list