[Klug-general] Hard Drives

MacGyveR macgyver at thedumbterminal.co.uk
Mon Apr 18 20:27:36 UTC 2011


On Sunday 17 Apr 2011, George Prowse wrote:
> On 17/04/2011 10:39, Peter Childs wrote:
> > My Linux Hard Disk has just failed..... Groan, not very much data
> > except OS on it so that will be easy to sort out...... (Looks like its
> > the Disk Controller thats failed not the disk as it works when it
> > feels like it) Its a SATA.....
> >
> > Now need to get a new one, Whats the best way to go.
> >
> > Speed Vs Size Vs Cost Vs Reliability....
> >
> > meaning
> >
> > SATA Vs PATA Vs USB Vs NAS
> >
> > Also need to upgrade that machine upstairs running Myth on a 40Gig
> > Disk which only takes PATA (Not SATA)
> >
> > Any suggestions which way to go?
> >
> > Peter.
>
> Horses for courses really.
>
> I have a 1TB NAS and a 1TB Internal. The NAS is ideal as long as you
> dont use it often (I keep media like films and videos on it) and it
> takes an age to transfer anything to and from it (compared to the
> internal of course).
>
> The internal is great for more intermediate storage (stuff you're going
> to keep that you change quite often.
>
> I personally wouldn't use a 1TB as a OS HDD, I use 300/250GB ones and
> probably wil do until SSDs of those size come down in price.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kent mailing list
> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent

I have a 1TB nas too for backup and a SATA drive in the workstation, I rate 
these:

http://www.dabs.com/products/d-link-sharecenter-pulse-2-bay-network-storage-enclosure-78PQ.html?q=nas

They run linux so and d-link provide the source if you are feeling hacky. They 
take two drives that it will use software raid and format ext3, this means if 
the nas enclosure dies you can read the disks in your linux pc.




More information about the Kent mailing list