[linuxjobs] "No agencies" policy?

[Cornelius Marney]

Hi,

I work for a recruitment agency and I suspect that my email today has started off the chain of "no agencies".

Whilst I appreciate that sometimes the emails are a little vague and this may be "annoying" to some, I have successfully found system administrator's jobs by using this method of letting people know about roles I'm working on.  I also have had potential candidates email me and say that they aren't looking at the moment/not interested in this particular role but have exchanged details and I have then gone on to find a job.

So all in all, I think that the list should stay open to agencies - because it has got people jobs.

Cornelius

-----Original Message-----
From: linuxjobs-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk [mailto:linuxjobs-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Peter Cannon
Sent: 14 November 2012 13:16
To: linuxjobs at mailman.lug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [linuxjobs] "No agencies" policy?

On 14/11/12 12:56, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2012, at 12:15, Andy Smith <andy at bitfolk.com> wrote:
>>     "lots of people use and get jobs through agencies, so since it
>>     results in someone getting a job there is no justification for
>>     banning these."
>
> This list is hardly inundated so I support keeping agency posts.

I second Ben's comment.

--
Regards
Peter Cannon

IRC: dick_turpin @ freenode.net
https://twitter.com/dick_turpin
http://www.cannon-linux.co.uk
https://plus.google.com/100694334141523232451/posts
Podcast: http://tdtrs.co.uk
"There is every excuse for not knowing
There is no excuse for not asking"

_______________________________________________
linuxjobs mailing list
linuxjobs at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linuxjobs