[Lust] Whats in your box? Just for fun.

[Rob]

Hi Karl,

Ah, just a guess on my part about Arch.  What got me was the extremely
up-to-date kernel.  I run Arch on my laptop.  I used to run Arch on both
my "desktops", but am now using Debian Testing on my main machine.  LFS
always looked too much like hard work to me.  I have tried Crux before
though.  I stuck with it for quite a while, but wanted something a bit
more structured (and yet configurable :).

Rob

* Karl (karlwillfixit at hotmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> I'm running slack 10.2 with Dropline GNOME. I tried arch ages ago but we
> didn't get on, so I built a couple of lfs's but we didn't get on either.
> Once a slacker always a slacker ;) I just upgraded to udev 092 too,
> boots really fast, I tried initng a few times but only got it to work
> correctly under lfs.
> Hey Kev, 'w' is a nice idea too:
> 
> tuttle at shangrila:~$ w
>  21:21:40 up 21:29,  2 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.10, 0.34
> USER     TTY      FROM              LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
> tuttle   :0       -                Thu23   ?xdm?  32:06   1.03s
> gnome-session
> tuttle   pts/0    :0.0             21:21    0.00s  0.04s  0.00s w
> 
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 20:18 +0100, Rob wrote:
> > Hi Karl,
> > 
> > Nice idea.  Are you running Arch by any chance?
> > 
> > Looks like Kevin's VM wins the uptime competition!  And I'd just
> > rebooted to take advantage of a udev update, not that that would have
> > even been close to 213 days ...
> > 
> > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > processor	: 0
> > vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family	: 15
> > model		: 47
> > model name	: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+
> > stepping	: 0
> > cpu MHz		: 2211.476
> > cache size	: 512 KB
> > fdiv_bug	: no
> > hlt_bug		: no
> > f00f_bug	: no
> > coma_bug	: no
> > fpu		: yes
> > fpu_exception	: yes
> > cpuid level	: 1
> > wp		: yes
> > flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm
> > bogomips	: 4425.67
> > 
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux aquilonia 2.6.15-1-686 #2 Mon Mar 6 15:27:08 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
> > 
> > $ w
> >  20:14:29 up 1 day,  1:47,  1 user,  load average: 0.10, 0.07, 0.01
> > USER     TTY      FROM              LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
> > rob      tty1     -                19:40   20:21m 18.92s  0.00s /bin/sh /usr/bi
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Rob
> > 
> > 
> > * Karl (karlwillfixit at hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > Hi all, I was bored so I though I'd try to spark a little enthusiasm -
> > > post your cpuinfo and uname just for fun :)
> > > 
> > > root at shangrila:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > > processor       : 0
> > > vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
> > > cpu family      : 6
> > > model           : 10
> > > model name      : AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2800+
> > > stepping        : 0
> > > cpu MHz         : 1875.602
> > > cache size      : 512 KB
> > > fdiv_bug        : no
> > > hlt_bug         : no
> > > f00f_bug        : no
> > > coma_bug        : no
> > > fpu             : yes
> > > fpu_exception   : yes
> > > cpuid level     : 1
> > > wp              : yes
> > > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > > mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow ts fid vid
> > > bogomips        : 3754.30
> > > 
> > > root at shangrila:~# uname -a
> > > Linux shangrila 2.6.16.20 #16 Mon Jun 5 21:00:23 BST 2006 i686 unknown
> > > unknown GNU/Linux
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Lust mailing list
> > > Lust at mailman.lug.org.uk
> > > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/lust
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lust mailing list
> > Lust at mailman.lug.org.uk
> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/lust
> > 



> _______________________________________________
> Lust mailing list
> Lust at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/lust