[Nottingham] Linux

James Gibbon nottingham at mailman.lug.org.uk
Sat May 24 17:40:01 2003

".waffle" wrote:
> Am i the only one who sees balnk emails, and the actual email is
> in an attachment? Very annoying...

I don't know if you're the only one, but I personally didn't
receive the message body you refer to (Robert's mail of 15:01 23/5)
as an attachment.  It came through as a multipart/signed, with
text/plain and application/pgp-signature parts, and my mailer
(exmh) handled it properly.

Does your mailer have trouble with these?