[Nottingham] .fetchmailrc difficulties

[James Gibbon]

Robert Davies wrote:
> On Thursday 11 Sep 2003 21:42, James Gibbon wrote:
> > Robert Davies wrote:
> > .. now, I'm uncertain whether "not flushed" is significant or
> > not.  I had assumed that it indicated that the mail was being
> > left on the server as required, but it seems that it may also
> > signify that there's a problem with local mail delivery.
> > However, the mail is turning up in my folders exactly as I'd
> > expect and there's nothing fishy at all in my procmail log.
> 
> NTL have Intermail to, what happens when you run the fetchmail -v
> again, where  the items are already 'seen'?  That's actually the
> interesting part.
> 

That's exactly what this was, Robert!  I'd already run fetchmail 
against the same messages a couple of times.

Thanks,
James