[Nottingham] .fetchmailrc difficulties

[Robert Davies]

On Thursday 11 Sep 2003 21:42, James Gibbon wrote:
> Robert Davies wrote:
> .. now, I'm uncertain whether "not flushed" is significant or
> not.  I had assumed that it indicated that the mail was being
> left on the server as required, but it seems that it may also
> signify that there's a problem with local mail delivery.
> However, the mail is turning up in my folders exactly as I'd
> expect and there's nothing fishy at all in my procmail log.

NTL have Intermail to, what happens when you run the fetchmail -v again, where 
the items are already 'seen'?  That's actually the interesting part.

Rob